How to Brainstorm Ideas: The Complete Guide to Effective Brainstorming in 2026

Research shows that teams using structured brainstorming methods generate up to 50% more creative solutions than unstructured approaches. This guide synthesizes decades of innovation research and practical experience into one actionable resource that will help your team to brainstorm ideas effectively.

Saturs

Kas ir prāta vētra?

Brainstorming is a structured creative process for generating multiple ideas or solutions to a specific problem. First introduced by advertising executive Alex Osborn in 1948, brainstorming encourages free thinking, suspends judgment during idea generation, and creates an environment where unconventional ideas can emerge.

Osborn developed brainstorming while leading BBDO (Batten, Barton, Durstine & Osborn), one of America's largest advertising agencies, during a period when the company was struggling. He noticed that traditional business meetings stifled creativity, with employees holding back ideas for fear of immediate criticism. His solution became what we now know as brainstorming, originally called "thinking up."

When to Use Brainstorming

Brainstorming works best for:

Business applications:

• Produktu izstrāde un inovācijas
• Marketing campaign ideation
• Problēmu risināšanas semināri
• Strategic planning sessions
• Procesu uzlabošanas iniciatīvas
• Customer experience enhancement

Izglītības iestādes:

• Pre-writing for essays and kicking off Project-Based Learning (PBL)
• Collaborative learning activities
• Creative writing exercises
• Zinātnes gadatirgu projekti
• Group presentations
• Nodarbību plāna izstrāde

Personal projects:

• Pasākumu plānošana
• Creative endeavors (art, writing, music)
• Career development decisions
• Personal goal setting

When NOT to Use Brainstorming

Brainstorming isn't always the answer. Skip brainstorming when:

• Decisions require deep technical expertise from a single domain
• Time constraints are too severe (< 15 minutes available)
• The problem has a single, known correct answer
• Individual reflection would be more productive
• Team dynamics are severely dysfunctional

The Science Behind Effective Brainstorming

Understanding the psychology and research behind brainstorming helps you avoid common pitfalls and structure more effective sessions.

What Research Tells Us

Production blocking
Pētījumi by Michael Diehl and Wolfgang Stroebe (1987) identified "production blocking" as a major challenge in group brainstorming. When one person speaks, others must wait, causing them to forget their ideas or lose momentum. This research led to the development of techniques like brainwriting, where everyone contributes simultaneously.

Psiholoģiskā drošība
Amy Edmondson's research at Harvard shows that psiholoģiskā drošība—the belief that you won't be punished or humiliated for speaking up—is the single most important factor in team effectiveness. Teams with high psychological safety generate more creative ideas and take more calculated risks.

A study from Harvard Business Review found that teams who shared embarrassing stories before brainstorming generated 26% more ideas spanning 15% more categories than control groups. The vulnerability created an atmosphere where judgment was suspended, leading to greater creative output.

Cognitive diversity
Pētījumi from MIT's Center for Collective Intelligence found that teams with diverse thinking styles and backgrounds consistently outperform homogeneous groups in creative problem-solving. The key isn't just demographic diversity, but cognitive diversity in how team members approach problems.

Noenkurošanās efekts
Early ideas in brainstorming sessions tend to anchor subsequent ideas, limiting creative range. Techniques like mind mapping and SCAMPER specifically combat this by forcing participants to explore multiple directions from the start.

Common Brainstorming Pitfalls

Grupu domāšana
The tendency for groups to seek consensus at the expense of critical evaluation. Combat this by encouraging devil's advocates and explicitly welcoming dissenting opinions.

Sociālā klabināšana
When individuals contribute less in groups than they would alone. Address this through individual accountability, such as having everyone submit ideas before group discussion.

Evaluation apprehension
Fear of negative evaluation causes people to self-censor creative ideas. Anonymous submission tools like AhaSlides solve this by removing attribution during idea generation.

The 7 Essential Brainstorming Rules

These core principles, refined from Alex Osborn's original framework and validated by decades of practice at IDEO, d.school, and leading organizations worldwide, form the foundation of effective brainstorming.

Rule 1: Defer Judgment

Ko tas nozīmē: Postpone all criticism and evaluation during idea generation. No idea should be dismissed, critiqued, or evaluated until after the brainstorming session concludes.

Kāpēc tas ir svarīgi: Judgment kills creativity before it can flourish. When participants fear criticism, they self-censor and withhold potentially breakthrough ideas. The best innovations often sound ridiculous initially.

Kā ieviest:

• State this rule clearly at the session's start
• Gently redirect any evaluative comments to later discussion
• Model non-judgment as the facilitator
• Consider banning phrases like "That won't work because..." or "We tried that before"
• Use a "parking lot" for ideas requiring immediate discussion

Rule 2: Encourage Wild Ideas

Ko tas nozīmē: Aktīvi atzinīgi vērtējiet netradicionālas, šķietami nepraktiskas vai "nestandarta" idejas, nekavējoties neraizējoties par to īstenojamību.

Kāpēc tas ir svarīgi: Wild ideas often contain the seeds of breakthrough solutions. Even impractical ideas can inspire practical innovations when refined. Encouraging wild thinking pushes the group beyond obvious solutions.

Kā ieviest:

• Skaidri aiciniet uz "neiespējamām" vai "trakām" idejām
• Svinēt visneparastākos ieteikumus
• Ask prompting questions like "What if money were no object?" or "What would we do if we could break any rule?"
• Reserve one section of your brainstorm specifically for "wild card" ideas

Rule 3: Build on Each Other's Ideas

Ko tas nozīmē: Listen to others' contributions and expand, combine, or modify them to create new possibilities.

Kāpēc tas ir svarīgi: Collaboration multiplies creativity. One person's incomplete thought becomes another's breakthrough solution. Building on ideas creates synergy where the whole exceeds the sum of parts.

Kā ieviest:

• Display all ideas visibly so everyone can reference them
• Regulāri jautājiet: "Kā mēs varam to attīstīt?"
• Use "Yes, and..." instead of "Yes, but..."
• Mudiniet dalībniekus apvienot vairākas idejas
• Give credit to both original contributors and those who build on ideas

Rule 4: Stay Focused on the Topic

Ko tas nozīmē: Ensure ideas remain relevant to the specific problem or challenge being addressed, while still allowing creative exploration within that boundary.

Kāpēc tas ir svarīgi: Focus prevents wasted time and ensures productive sessions. While creativity is encouraged, maintaining relevance ensures ideas can actually address the challenge at hand.

Kā ieviest:

• Write the problem or question prominently where everyone can see it
• Uzmanīgi novirziet uzmanību, ja idejas pārāk novirzās no tēmas
• Use a "parking lot" for interesting but tangential ideas
• Periodically restate the core challenge
• Balance focus with flexibility

Rule 5: Strive for Quantity

Ko tas nozīmē: Generate as many ideas as possible without worrying about quality or feasibility during the initial phase.

Kāpēc tas ir svarīgi: Research consistently shows that quantity leads to quality. The first ideas are usually obvious. Breakthrough solutions typically emerge after exhausting conventional thinking. More options provide better chances of finding exceptional solutions.

Kā ieviest:

• Set specific quantity goals (e.g., "50 ideas in 20 minutes")
• Use timers to create urgency
• Veiciniet ātru ideju ģenerēšanu
• Remind participants that every idea counts
• Track idea count visibly to build momentum

Rule 6: One Conversation at a Time

Ko tas nozīmē: Maintain focus by having only one person speak at a time, ensuring everyone can hear and consider each idea.

Kāpēc tas ir svarīgi: Side conversations create noise that drowns out good ideas. When people multi-task between listening and talking, they miss opportunities to build on others' contributions.

Kā ieviest:

• Establish clear turn-taking protocols
• Use round-robin or raised-hand systems
• In virtual sessions, use chat for side notes and verbal for main ideas
• Keep side conversations to breaks
• Redirect gently when multiple conversations emerge

Rule 7: Use Visuals

Ko tas nozīmē: Leverage visual communication, sketches, diagrams, and imagery to express and develop ideas more effectively than words alone.

Kāpēc tas ir svarīgi: Visual thinking engages different parts of the brain, triggering new connections and ideas. Simple visuals communicate complex concepts faster than text. Even stick figures beat no visuals.

Kā ieviest:

• Provide markers, sticky notes, and large paper or whiteboards
• Encourage sketching, even for those who "can't draw"
• Use visual frameworks (mind maps, matrices, diagrams)
• Capture ideas with both words and images
• Leverage digital tools like AhaSlides' live word clouds generator to visualize emerging themes

How to Prepare for a Brainstorming Session

Successful brainstorming starts before participants enter the room. Proper preparation dramatically improves session quality and outcomes.

Step 1: Define the Problem Clearly

The quality of your brainstorming outcomes depends heavily on how well you frame the problem. Invest time in crafting a clear, specific problem statement.

Best practices for problem framing:

Be specific, not vague:

• Instead of: "How do we increase sales?"
• Try: "How do we increase online sales to millennials in urban areas by 20% in Q2?"

Focus on outcomes, not solutions:

• Instead of: "Should we create a mobile app?"
• Try: "How do we make our service more accessible to customers on-the-go?"

Use "How might we" questions: This design thinking framework opens possibilities while maintaining focus.

• "How might we reduce customer service wait times?"
• "How might we make learning more engaging for 5th graders?"
• "How might we help new employees feel connected to company culture?"

Consider user stories: Frame challenges from the user's perspective:

• "As a [user type], I want [goal], because [reason]"
• "As a busy parent, I want quick healthy meal options, because I have limited time after work"

Step 2: Select the Right Participants

Optimal group size: 5-12 cilvēki
Too few limits perspectives; too many creates production blocking and coordination challenges.

Diversity matters:

• Cognitive diversity: Include different thinking styles and problem-solving approaches
• Domain diversity: Mix subject matter experts with "outside" perspectives
• Hierarchical diversity: Include various organizational levels (but manage power dynamics carefully)
• Demographic diversity: Different backgrounds bring different insights

Who to include:

• People directly impacted by the problem
• Subject matter experts with relevant knowledge
• Creative thinkers who challenge assumptions
• Implementation stakeholders who'll execute solutions
• "Outsiders" with fresh perspectives

Who to exclude (or invite selectively):

• Extreme skeptics who consistently shoot down ideas
• Those with power to shut down ideas prematurely
• People tangential to the problem who'll derail focus

Step 3: Choose the Right Environment

Physical environment (in-person):

• Large open space with moveable furniture
• Abundant wall space for posting ideas
• Good lighting and comfortable temperature
• Minimal distractions and interruptions
• Access to materials (sticky notes, markers, whiteboards)

Virtual environment:

• Reliable video conferencing platform
• Digital whiteboard or collaboration tool (Miro, Mural, AhaSlides)
• Backup communication method
• Pre-session tech check
• Clear virtual ground rules

Laika apsvērumi:

• Avoid early Monday mornings or late Friday afternoons
• Schedule around participants' peak energy times
• Allow adequate time (typically 60-90 minutes for complex problems)
• Build in breaks for longer sessions

Step 4: Set the Agenda

A clear agenda keeps sessions productive and focused.

Sample 90-minute brainstorming agenda:

0:00-0:10 - Welcome and warm-up

• Introductions if needed
• Review ground rules
• Quick icebreaker activity

0:10-0:20 - Problem framing

• Present the challenge clearly
• Provide context and background
• Answer clarifying questions
• Share any relevant data or constraints

0:20-0:50 - Divergent thinking (idea generation)

• Use chosen brainstorming technique(s)
• Encourage quantity
• Suspend judgment
• Capture all ideas

0:50-1:00 - Break

• Brief reset
• Informal processing time

1:00-1:20 - Convergent thinking (refinement)

• Organize ideas into themes
• Combine similar concepts
• Initial evaluation against criteria

1:20-1:30 - Next steps

• Identify top ideas for further development
• Assign follow-up responsibilities
• Schedule any needed additional sessions
• Thank participants

Step 5: Prepare Materials and Tools

Physical materials:

• Sticky notes (multiple colors)
• Markers and pens
• Large paper or flipcharts
• Tāfele
• Dots or stickers for voting
• Taimeris
• Camera to document results

Digitālie rīki:

• AhaSlides for interactive brainstorming, word clouds, and voting
• Digital whiteboard (Miro, Mural, Conceptboard)
• Domu kartēšanas programmatūra
• Document for capturing ideas
• Screen sharing capability

Step 6: Send Pre-Work (Optional)

For complex challenges, consider sending participants:

• Background on the problem
• Relevant data or research
• Questions to consider in advance
• Request to come with 3-5 initial ideas
• Agenda and logistics

Piezīme: Balance pre-work against spontaneity. Sometimes the freshest ideas come from minimal preparation.

20+ Proven Brainstorming Techniques

Different techniques suit different situations, group sizes, and objectives. Master these methods and you'll have a tool for every brainstorming scenario.

Visual Techniques

These methods leverage visual thinking to unlock creativity and organize complex ideas.

1. Domu kartēšana

Kas tas ir: A visual technique that organizes ideas around a central concept, using branches to show relationships and connections.

Kad lietot:

• Exploring complex topics with multiple dimensions
• Planning projects or content
• Organizing information that has natural hierarchies
• Working with visual thinkers

Kā tas darbojas:

1. Write the central topic in the middle of a large page
2. Zīmējiet zarus galvenajām tēmām vai kategorijām
3. Pievienot apakšnozares saistītām idejām
4. Turpiniet zaroties, lai izpētītu detaļas
5. Use colors, images, and symbols to enhance meaning
6. Draw connections between different branches

Pros:

• Mirrors natural thought processes
• Parāda ideju savstarpējās attiecības
• Veicina nelineāru domāšanu
• Easy to add details progressively

Mīnusi:

• Can become complex and overwhelming
• Less effective for simple, linear problems
• Requires space and visual materials

Piemērs: A marketing team mind-mapping a product launch might have branches for target audiences, channels, messaging, timing, and budget, with each branch expanding into specific tactics and considerations.

2. Storyboarding

Kas tas ir: A sequential visual narrative that maps out a process, experience, or journey using sketches or descriptions.

Kad lietot:

• Designing user experiences or customer journeys
• Planning events or processes
• Developing training materials
• Creating narrative-driven content

Kā tas darbojas:

1. Identify the starting point and desired end state
2. Break the journey into key stages or moments
3. Create a frame for each stage
4. Sketch or describe what happens in each frame
5. Show connections and transitions between frames
6. Add notes about emotions, pain points, or opportunities

Pros:

• Visualizes processes and experiences
• Identifies gaps and pain points
• Creates shared understanding of sequences
• Works for both physical and digital experiences

Mīnusi:

• Time-intensive to create detailed storyboards
• Requires some comfort with visual expression
• Can overemphasize linear progression

Piemērs: An onboarding team storyboarding a new employee's first week, with frames showing pre-arrival preparation, arrival, team introductions, initial training, first project assignment, and week-end check-in.

3. Sketchstorming

Kas tas ir: Rapid visual idea generation where participants sketch concepts quickly, even with limited drawing skills.

Kad lietot:

• Produktu dizains un izstrāde
• User interface ideation
• Visual branding exercises
• Any project benefiting from visual exploration

Kā tas darbojas:

1. Iestatiet laika ierobežojumu (parasti 5–10 minūtes)
2. Each participant sketches their ideas
3. No artistic skill required—stick figures and simple shapes work
4. Share and build on each other's sketches
5. Combine strongest visual elements

Pros:

• Breaks free from text-based thinking
• Accessible to everyone (no artistic skill needed)
• Communicates complex ideas quickly
• Engages different cognitive processes

Mīnusi:

• Some people resist due to drawing anxiety
• Can emphasize form over function
• May disadvantage those with visual impairments

4. Trakie astoņnieki

Kas tas ir: A rapid sketching technique where participants generate eight different ideas in eight minutes, spending one minute per sketch.

Kad lietot:

• Pushing beyond obvious first ideas
• Time-constrained ideation
• Generating visual variety quickly
• Individual or small group sessions

Kā tas darbojas:

1. Fold a sheet of paper into eight sections
2. Iestatiet taimeri uz 8 minūtēm
3. Sketch one idea per section, spending roughly 1 minute each
4. Share sketches when time expires
5. Discuss, combine, and refine top ideas

Pros:

• Forces quick thinking and prevents overthinking
• Generates volume rapidly
• Equal participation (everyone creates 8 ideas)
• Uncovers diverse approaches

Mīnusi:

• Can feel rushed and stressful
• Quality may suffer due to time pressure
• Not suitable for complex problems requiring deep thought

Quiet Techniques

These approaches give introverts and deliberate thinkers space to contribute meaningfully, reducing the dominance of extroverted voices.

5. Brainwriting

Kas tas ir: Silent, individual idea generation where participants write ideas before sharing with the group.

Kad lietot:

• Groups with dominant personalities
• Introverti komandas biedri
• Reducing social pressure and groupthink
• Ensuring equal contribution
• Virtual or asynchronous brainstorming

Kā tas darbojas:

1. Give each participant paper or digital document
2. Pose the problem clearly
3. Set time limit (5-10 minutes)
4. Participants write ideas silently
5. Collect and share ideas (anonymously if desired)
6. Discuss and build on ideas as a group

Pros:

• Equal participation regardless of personality
• Reduces social anxiety and judgment
• Prevents dominant voices from taking over
• Allows time for deeper reflection
• Works well remotely

Mīnusi:

• Less energy than verbal brainstorming
• Loses some spontaneous building on ideas
• May feel disconnected or isolating

Piemērs: A product team exploring new feature ideas. Each person spends 10 minutes listing features, then all ideas are shared anonymously via AhaSlides. The team votes on top concepts, then discusses implementation.

6. 6-3-5 Brainwriting

Kas tas ir: A structured brainwriting method where 6 people write 3 ideas in 5 minutes, then pass their paper to the next person who adds to or modifies those ideas.

Kad lietot:

• Building on each other's ideas systematically
• Generating large volumes quickly (108 ideas in 30 minutes)
• Ensuring everyone contributes equally
• Combining quiet reflection with collaboration

Kā tas darbojas:

1. Gather 6 participants (adaptable to other numbers)
2. Each person writes 3 ideas in 5 minutes
3. Pass papers to the right
4. Read the existing ideas and add 3 more (building on, modifying, or adding new)
5. Repeat 5 more rounds (6 total)
6. Review and discuss all ideas

Pros:

• Generates high volume systematically (6 people × 3 ideas × 6 rounds = 108 ideas)
• Builds on ideas progressively
• Equal participation guaranteed
• Apvieno individuālo un grupas domāšanu

Mīnusi:

• Rigid structure may feel constraining
• Requires specific group size
• Ideas may become repetitive in later rounds
• Time-intensive for full process

7. Nominal Group Technique (NGT)

Kas tas ir: A structured method combining silent idea generation, sharing, discussion, and democratic voting to prioritize ideas.

Kad lietot:

• Important decisions requiring consensus
• Groups with power imbalances
• Prioritizing from many options
• Ensuring fair participation
• Controversial or sensitive topics

Kā tas darbojas:

1. Silent generation: Participants write ideas individually (5-10 minutes)
2. Round-robin sharing: Each person shares one idea; facilitator records all ideas without discussion
3. Noskaidrošana: Group discusses ideas for understanding (not evaluation)
4. Individual ranking: Each person privately ranks or votes on ideas
5. Group prioritization: Combine individual rankings to identify top priorities
6. Diskusija: Discuss top-ranked ideas and make decisions

Pros:

• Balances individual and group input
• Samazina dominējošo personību ietekmi
• Veicina atbalstu, piedaloties
• Democratic and transparent process
• Works well for controversial topics

Mīnusi:

• More time-intensive than simple brainstorming
• Formal structure may feel rigid
• Can suppress spontaneous discussion
• Voting may oversimplify complex issues

Analītiskās metodes

These methods provide structure for systematic analysis, helping teams evaluate ideas from multiple angles.

8. SVID analīze

Kas tas ir: A framework evaluating Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats for ideas, strategies, or decisions.

Kad lietot:

• Stratēģiskā plānošana un lēmumu pieņemšana
• Evaluating multiple options
• Assessing feasibility before implementation
• Riska identificēšana
• Biznesa plānošana

Kā tas darbojas:

1. Define the idea, project, or strategy to analyze
2. Create four quadrants: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats
3. Ideju ģenerēšana katram kvadrantam:
   • Stiprās puses: Internal positive factors and advantages
   • Vājās puses: Internal negative factors and limitations
   • Iespējas: External positive factors and possibilities
   • Draudi: External negative factors and risks
4. Discuss and prioritize items in each quadrant
5. Izstrādāt stratēģijas, pamatojoties uz analīzi

Pros:

• Comprehensive view of situation
• Considers both internal and external factors
• Identifies risks early
• Veido kopīgu izpratni
• Supports data-driven decisions

Mīnusi:

• Can be superficial if rushed
• May oversimplify complex situations
• Requires honest assessment
• Static snapshot (doesn't show evolution)

9. Six Thinking Hats

Kas tas ir: A technique by Edward de Bono that explores problems from six distinct perspectives, represented by colored "hats."

Kad lietot:

• Complex decisions requiring thorough analysis
• Reducing argument and conflict
• Ensuring multiple perspectives are considered
• Breaking out of habitual thinking patterns

The Six Hats:

• White Hat: Facts and data (objective information)
• Sarkana cepure: Emotions and feelings (intuitive responses)
• Melna cepure: Critical thinking (risks, problems, why it might not work)
• Dzeltenā cepure: Optimism and benefits (why it will work, advantages)
• Zaļā cepure: Creativity (new ideas, alternatives, possibilities)
• Blue Hat: Process control (facilitation, organization, next steps)

Kā tas darbojas:

1. Introduce the six thinking perspectives
2. Everyone "wears" the same hat simultaneously
3. Explore the problem from that perspective
4. Switch hats systematically (usually 5-10 minutes per hat)
5. Blue Hat facilitates and determines sequence
6. Synthesize insights from all perspectives

Pros:

• Atšķir dažādus domāšanas veidus
• Reduces argument (everyone explores same perspective together)
• Ensures comprehensive analysis
• Legitimizes emotional and creative thinking
• Creates psychological separation from personal views

Mīnusi:

• Requires training and practice
• Can feel artificial initially
• Time-intensive for full process
• May oversimplify complex emotional responses

10. Starbursting

Kas tas ir: An idea evaluation method that generates questions about an idea using the "who, what, when, where, why, and how" framework.

Kad lietot:

• Vetting ideas thoroughly before implementation
• Identifying gaps and assumptions
• Plānošana un sagatavošana
• Uncovering potential challenges

Kā tas darbojas:

1. Draw a six-pointed star with your idea in the center
2. Label each point with: Who, What, When, Where, Why, How
3. Generate questions for each point:
   • Kas: Who will benefit? Who will implement? Who might resist?
   • Ko: What resources are needed? What are the steps? What could go wrong?
   • Kad: When should this launch? When will we see results?
   • kur: Where will this happen? Where might challenges arise?
   • Kāpēc: Why is this important? Why might it fail?
   • Kā: How will we execute? How will we measure success?
4. Discuss answers and implications
5. Identify areas requiring more information or planning

Pros:

• Systematic and thorough
• Uncovers assumptions and gaps
• Generates implementation insights
• Viegli saprotams un lietojams
• Applicable to any idea or project

Mīnusi:

• Primarily analytical (not idea generation)
• Can generate too many questions
• May create analysis paralysis
• Less creative than other techniques

11. Reverse Brainstorming

Kas tas ir: Generating ideas for how to cause or worsen a problem, then reversing those ideas to find solutions.

Kad lietot:

• Stuck on a difficult problem
• Breaking through conventional thinking
• Pamatcēloņu identificēšana
• Challenging assumptions
• Making problem-solving fun and engaging

Kā tas darbojas:

1. Clearly state the problem you want to solve
2. Reverse it: "How can we make this problem worse?" or "How can we guarantee failure?"
3. Generate as many ideas as possible for causing the problem
4. Reverse each idea to identify potential solutions
5. Novērtējiet un pilnveidojiet apgrieztos risinājumus
6. Develop implementation plans for promising ideas

Piemērs:

• Original problem: How do we improve customer satisfaction?
• Apgriezts: How do we make customers angry and frustrated?
• Reversed ideas: Ignore their calls, be rude, ship wrong products, provide no information
• Risinājumi: Improve response times, train staff in customer service, implement quality control, create comprehensive FAQs

Pros:

• Makes problem-solving fun and energizing
• Reveals hidden assumptions
• Easier to criticize than create (taps into that energy)
• Identificē pamatcēloņus
• Engages skeptical participants

Mīnusi:

• Indirect route to solutions
• May generate unrealistic "reverse" ideas
• Requires translation step (reverse to solution)
• Can become negative if not managed well

12. Five Whys

Kas tas ir: A root cause analysis technique that asks "why" repeatedly (typically five times) to dig beneath surface symptoms and find underlying issues.

Kad lietot:

• Problem diagnosis and root cause analysis
• Understanding failures or issues
• Moving beyond symptoms to causes
• Simple problems with clear cause-effect chains

Kā tas darbojas:

1. State the problem clearly
2. Ask "Why does this happen?"
3. Answer based on facts
4. Ask "Why?" about that answer
5. Continue asking "Why?" (usually 5 times, but may be more or fewer)
6. When you reach a root cause (cannot meaningfully ask why again), develop solutions targeting that cause

Piemērs:

1. Problēma: We missed our project deadline
2. Kāpēc? The final report wasn't ready
3. Kāpēc? Key data wasn't available
4. Kāpēc? The survey wasn't sent to customers
5. Kāpēc? We didn't have an updated customer list
6. Kāpēc? We don't have a process for maintaining customer data
7. Galvenais cēlonis: Lack of customer data management process
8. Risinājums: Implement CRM system with data maintenance protocols

Pros:

• Vienkāršs un pieejams
• Digs beneath surface symptoms
• Identifies actionable root causes
• Works for many types of problems
• Veicina kritisko domāšanu

Mīnusi:

• Oversimplifies complex problems with multiple causes
• Assumes linear cause-effect relationships
• Investigator bias can lead to predetermined "root causes"
• May miss systemic or cultural factors

Collaborative Techniques

These methods leverage group dynamics and build on collective intelligence.

13. Round-Robin Brainstorming

Kas tas ir: A structured approach where participants take turns sharing one idea at a time, ensuring everyone contributes equally.

Kad lietot:

• Ensuring equal participation
• Groups with dominant personalities
• Generating comprehensive lists
• In-person or virtual meetings

Kā tas darbojas:

1. Sit in a circle (physical or virtual)
2. Set ground rules (one idea per turn, pass if needed)
3. Start with one person sharing an idea
4. Move clockwise, each person sharing one idea
5. Continue rounds until ideas are exhausted
6. Allow "passes" when someone has no new ideas
7. Capture all ideas visibly

Pros:

• Guarantees everyone speaks
• Prevents domination by few voices
• Structured and predictable
• Easy to facilitate
• Builds on previous ideas

Mīnusi:

• Can feel slow or rigid
• Pressure to contribute in turn
• May lose spontaneous connections
• People may spend turns thinking instead of listening

14. Rapid Ideation

Kas tas ir: Fast-paced, high-energy idea generation with strict time limits to prevent overthinking and maximize quantity.

Kad lietot:

• Breaking through analysis paralysis
• Generating large volumes quickly
• Energizing a group
• Pushing beyond obvious ideas

Kā tas darbojas:

1. Set aggressive time limit (typically 5-15 minutes)
2. Aim for specific quantity goal
3. Generate ideas as fast as possible
4. No discussion or evaluation during generation
5. Capture everything, no matter how rough
6. Review and refine after time expires

Pros:

• High energy and engaging
• Prevents overthinking
• Generates volume rapidly
• Breaks through perfectionism
• Rada impulsu

Mīnusi:

• Quality may suffer
• Can be stressful
• May favor quick thinkers over deep thinkers
• Difficult to capture ideas fast enough

15. Affinity Mapping

Kas tas ir: Organizing large numbers of ideas into related groups to identify patterns, themes, and priorities.

Kad lietot:

• After generating many ideas
• Synthesizing complex information
• Identifying themes and patterns
• Building consensus around categories

Kā tas darbojas:

1. Generate ideas (using any technique)
2. Write each idea on separate sticky note
3. Rādīt visas idejas redzami
4. Silently group related ideas together
5. Izveidojiet kategoriju etiķetes katrai grupai
6. Apspriest un precizēt grupas
7. Prioritize categories or ideas within categories

Pros:

• Makes sense of large idea sets
• Reveals patterns and themes
• Collaborative and democratic
• Visual and tangible
• Builds shared understanding

Mīnusi:

• Not an idea generation technique (organization only)
• Can be time-consuming with many ideas
• Disagreement on categorization
• Some ideas may fit multiple categories

Question-Based Techniques

These approaches use questions rather than answers to unlock new perspectives.

16. Question Bursts

Kas tas ir: A technique developed by MIT professor Hals Grēgersens where teams generate as many questions as possible in a short time, rather than answers.

Kad lietot:

• Reframing problems
• Challenging assumptions
• Atbrīvošanās
• Seeing problems from new angles

Kā tas darbojas:

1. Present the challenge in 2 minutes (high-level, minimal detail)
2. Set timer for 4 minutes
3. Generate as many questions as possible (aim for 15+)
4. Rules: Questions only, no preambles, no answering questions
5. Review questions and identify most provocative ones
6. Select top questions to explore further

Pros:

• Reframes problems quickly
• Easier than generating solutions
• Uncovers assumptions
• Creates fresh perspectives
• Engaging and energizing

Mīnusi:

• Doesn't generate solutions directly
• Requires follow-up to answer questions
• Can feel frustrating without answers
• May generate too many directions to pursue

17. How Might We (HMW) Questions

Kas tas ir: A design thinking method that frames problems as opportunities using the "How might we..." structure.

Kad lietot:

• Defining design challenges
• Reframing negative problems as positive opportunities
• Beginning ideation sessions
• Creating optimistic, actionable problem statements

Kā tas darbojas:

1. Start with a problem or insight
2. Reframe as "How might we..." question
3. Make it:
   • Optimistisks (assumes solutions exist)
   • atvērts (allows multiple solutions)
   • Darbojas (suggests clear direction)
   • Not too broad or par šauru
4. Generate multiple HMW variations
5. Select most promising HMW to brainstorm solutions

Pros:

• Creates optimistic, opportunity-focused framing
• Opens multiple solution paths
• Widely used in design thinking
• Easy to learn and apply
• Shifts mindset from problem to possibility

Mīnusi:

• Doesn't generate solutions (just frames questions)
• Can feel formulaic
• Risk of questions that are too broad or vague
• May oversimplify complex problems

Uzlabotas metodes

18. KRĀDĪTĀJS

Kas tas ir: An acronym-based checklist that prompts creative thinking by systematically modifying existing ideas.

The SCAMPER Prompts:

• Aizstājējs: What can be replaced or swapped?
• Apvienot: What can be merged or integrated?
• Pielāgot: What can be adjusted for different use?
• Modify/Magnify/Minify: What can be changed in scale or attributes?
• Put to another use: How else could this be used?
• Likvidēt: What can be removed or simplified?
• Reverse/Rearrange: What can be done backwards or in different order?

Kad lietot:

• Produktu izstrāde un inovācijas
• Improving existing solutions
• When stuck on a problem
• Systematic creativity exercises

Kā tas darbojas:

1. Select an existing product, process, or idea
2. Apply each SCAMPER prompt systematically
3. Generate ideas for each category
4. Combine promising modifications
5. Evaluate feasibility and impact

Pros:

• Systematic and comprehensive
• Works for any existing idea or product
• Easy to remember (acronym)
• Forces exploration of multiple directions
• Good for innovation workshops

Mīnusi:

• Builds on existing ideas (not for truly new concepts)
• Can feel mechanical
• Generates many mediocre ideas
• Requires strong existing idea to start

Pareizās tehnikas izvēle

With 20+ techniques available, how do you choose? Consider:

Grupas lielums:

• Mazās grupas (2–5): Question bursts, rapid ideation, SCAMPER
• Medium groups (6-12): Brainwriting, round-robin, Six Thinking Hats
• Lielas grupas (13+): Affinity mapping, nominal group technique

Session goals:

• Maximum quantity: Rapid ideation, crazy eights, round-robin
• Deep exploration: SWOT, Six Thinking Hats, Five Whys
• Equal participation: Brainwriting, nominal group technique
• Visual thinking: Mind mapping, storyboarding, sketchstorming
• Problem diagnosis: Five Whys, reverse brainstorming

Team dynamics:

• Dominant personalities: Brainwriting, nominal group technique
• Introverted team: Quiet techniques
• Skeptical team: Reverse brainstorming, Six Thinking Hats
• Need fresh perspectives: Question bursts, SCAMPER

Step-by-Step Brainstorming Process

Follow this proven framework to run effective brainstorming sessions from start to finish.

Phase 1: Warm-Up (5-10 minutes)

Starting cold leads to awkward silence and superficial ideas. Warm up the creative muscles with a quick activity.

Effective icebreakers:

Embarrassing story sharing
You can ask each person to share an embarrassing story related to their work, like 'Share your best "replied all" horror story.' This creates common bridges among participants and let everyone be comfortable with each other in a shorter time span.

Desert island
Ask everyone what 3 items they'd want if stranded on a desert island for one year.

Divas patiesības un meli
Each person shares three statements about themselves—two true, one false. Others guess the lie.

Quick quiz
Run a 5-minute fun quiz using AhaSlides on a lighthearted topic.

Phase 2: Problem Framing (5-15 minutes)

Present the challenge clearly:

1. State the problem simply and specifically
2. Provide relevant context and background
3. Share key constraints (budget, time, resources)
4. Explain why solving this matters
5. Clarify what success looks like
6. Answer clarifying questions

Phase 3: Divergent Thinking - Idea Generation (20-40 minutes)

This is the core brainstorming phase. Use one or more techniques from the previous section.

Galvenie principi:

• Enforce the 7 brainstorming rules strictly
• Encourage volume over quality
• Capture every idea visibly
• Keep energy high
• Prevent evaluation or criticism
• Set clear time limits

Using AhaSlides for idea generation:

1. Create a brainstorming slide with your problem statement
2. Participants submit ideas from their phones
3. Ideas appear live on screen
4. Everyone can see the full collection and vote on the best ideas for next phase

Phase 4: Break (5-10 minutes)

Don't skip the break! It allows ideas to incubate, energy to reset, and mental shift from generation to evaluation mode.

Phase 5: Convergent Thinking - Organization & Refinement (15-30 minutes)

Step 1: Organize ideas - Group similar ideas using affinity mapping:

• Silently sort ideas into related themes
• Create category labels
• Discuss groupings and refine
• Identificējiet modeļus

Step 2: Clarify ideas

• Review unclear ideas
• Ask proposers to explain
• Combine duplicate or very similar ideas
• Capture intent, not just words

Step 3: Initial evaluation - Apply quick filters:

• Does it address the problem?
• Is it feasible (even if challenging)?
• Is it new/different enough to pursue?

Step 4: Voting on top ideas -Use multi-voting to narrow options:

• Give each person 3-5 votes
• Can place multiple votes on one idea if strongly preferred
• Tally votes
• Discuss top 5-10 ideas

Using AhaSlides for voting:

1. Add top ideas to a poll slide
2. Participants vote from their phones
3. Results display live
4. Instantly see top priorities

Phase 6: Next Steps (5-10 minutes)

Don't end without clear action items:

Piešķirt īpašumtiesības:

• Who will develop each top idea further?
• When will they report back?
• What resources do they need?

Schedule follow-up:

• Set date for next discussion
• Determine what analysis is needed
• Create timeline for decisions

Visu dokumentē:

• Capture all ideas
• Save categories and themes
• Record decisions made
• Share summary with all participants

Thank participants

Brainstorming for Different Contexts

Business and Workplace Brainstorming

Izplatītas lietojumprogrammas:

• Product development and feature ideation
• Marketing campaigns and content strategies
• Procesu uzlabošanas iniciatīvas
• Stratēģiskā plānošana
• Problēmu risināšanas semināri

Business-specific considerations:

• Jaudas dinamika: Senior leaders can inhibit honest ideation
• ROI pressure: Balance creative freedom with business constraints
• Cross-functional needs: Include diverse departments
• Implementation focus: End with concrete action plans

Sample business brainstorming questions:

1. "What channels should we focus on to maximize revenue growth?"
2. "How might we differentiate our product in a crowded market?"
3. "What's the ideal customer persona for our new service?"
4. "How can we reduce customer acquisition cost by 30%?"
5. "What positions should we hire for next and why?"

Educational Brainstorming

Izplatītas lietojumprogrammas:

• Essay and project planning
• Group assignments and presentations
• Creative writing exercises
• STEM problem-solving
• Classroom discussions

Education-specific considerations:

• Prasmju attīstība: Use brainstorming to teach critical thinking
• Varying ages: Adapt techniques for developmental levels
• Novērtējums: Consider how to evaluate participation fairly
• Iesaistīšanās: Make it fun and interactive
• Quiet students: Use techniques ensuring everyone contributes

Sample educational brainstorming questions:

Elementary (K-5):

1. "What's the best way to get to school and why?"
2. "If you could invent anything, what would it be?"
3. "How can we make our classroom more fun?"

Vidusskola:

1. "How can we reduce waste in our cafeteria?"
2. "What are different perspectives on this historical event?"
3. "How might we design a better school schedule?"

Vidusskola:

1. "What's the best way to measure a country's success?"
2. "How should we address climate change in our community?"
3. "What role should social media play in education?"

College/university:

1. "How might we reimagine higher education for the 21st century?"
2. "What research questions matter most in our field?"
3. "How can we make academic research more accessible?"

Remote and Hybrid Brainstorming

Special challenges:

• Technology barriers and connectivity issues
• Reduced nonverbal communication
• "Zoom fatigue" and shorter attention spans
• Difficulty building energy and momentum
• Laika joslu saskaņošana

Labākā pieredze:

Technology setup:

• Test all tools beforehand
• Have backup communication methods
• Use digital whiteboards (Miro, Mural)
• Leverage AhaSlides for interactive participation
• Record sessions for those who can't attend live

Facilitation adaptations:

• Shorter sessions (45-60 minutes max)
• More frequent breaks (every 20-30 minutes)
• Explicit turn-taking
• Use chat for side thoughts
• More structured techniques

Iesaistīšanās stratēģijas:

• Keep cameras on when possible
• Use reactions and emojis for quick feedback
• Sviras aptaujas and voting features
• Atpūtas telpas mazo grupu darbam
• Asynchronous components for global teams

Solo Brainstorming

When to brainstorm solo:

• Personal projects and decisions
• Pre-work before group sessions
• Writing and creative projects
• When you need deep focus

Effective solo techniques:

• Domu kartēšana
• Brīva rakstīšana
• SKAMPERIS
• Pieci kāpēc
• Question bursts
• Walking brainstorm

Solo brainstorming tips:

• Nosakiet konkrētus laika ierobežojumus
• Change environments to shift thinking
• Take breaks and let ideas incubate
• Talk out loud to yourself
• Don't self-censor initially
• Review and refine in a separate session

Troubleshooting Common Brainstorming Problems

Problem: Dominant Voices

Pazīmes:

• Same 2-3 people contribute most ideas
• Others remain silent or disengaged
• Ideas build only in one direction

Risinājumi:

• Use round-robin to ensure equal turns
• Implement brainwriting or nominal group technique
• Set explicit "no interrupting" rule
• Use anonymous submission tools like AhaSlides
• Have facilitator call on quieter participants
• Break into smaller groups

Problem: Silence and Low Participation

Pazīmes:

• Long awkward pauses
• People looking uncomfortable
• Few or no ideas being shared
• Lack of energy in the room

Risinājumi:

• Start with a more engaging warm-up
• Use private brainstorming first, then share
• Make submission anonymous
• Reduce group size
• Check if the problem is well-understood
• Share example ideas to prime the pump
• Use more structured techniques

Problem: Premature Judgment and Criticism

Pazīmes:

• People saying "That won't work" or "We tried that"
• Ideas being shot down immediately
• Defensive responses from idea-sharers
• Innovation declining as session progresses

Risinājumi:

• Restate the "defer judgment" rule
• Gently redirect critical comments
• Consider banning phrases like "Yes, but..."
• Model non-judgmental language as facilitator
• Use techniques that separate generation from evaluation
• Separate people from ideas (anonymous submission)

Problem: Getting Stuck or Running Out of Ideas

Pazīmes:

• Ideas slowing to a trickle
• Repetition of similar concepts
• Participants looking mentally exhausted
• Long pauses with no new contributions

Risinājumi:

• Switch to a different technique
• Take a break and return refreshed
• Ask prompting questions:
  • "What would [competitor/expert] do?"
  • "What if we had unlimited budget?"
  • "What's the craziest idea we could try?"
• Revisit the problem statement (reframe it)
• Use SCAMPER or another systematic technique
• Bring in fresh perspectives

Problem: Time Management Issues

Pazīmes:

• Running significantly over time
• Rushing important phases
• Not reaching refinement or decision stage
• Participants checking watches or phones

Risinājumi:

• Set clear time limits upfront
• Use visible timer
• Assign a timekeeper
• Stick to the agenda
• Be willing to extend slightly if productive
• Schedule follow-up session if needed
• Use more time-efficient techniques

Problem: Conflict and Disagreements

Pazīmes:

• Tension between participants
• Defensive or aggressive body language
• Arguments about ideas
• Personal attacks (even subtle ones)

Risinājumi:

• Pause and restate ground rules
• Remind everyone all ideas are valid in this phase
• Separate people from ideas
• Use Blue Hat (Six Thinking Hats) to refocus
• Take a break to cool down
• Private conversation with conflicting parties
• Focus on shared goals and values

Problem: Virtual Session Technical Issues

Pazīmes:

• Savienojuma problēmas
• Audio/video quality issues
• Tool access problems
• Participants dropping off

Risinājumi:

• Have backup communication method
• Test technology beforehand
• Share clear instructions in advance
• Record session for those with issues
• Have offline participation option
• Keep sessions shorter
• Use simple, reliable tools
• Have technical support person available